| Uploader: | Fegrel |
| Date Added: | 1 December 2008 |
| File Size: | 31.69 Mb |
| Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
| Downloads: | 20459 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
List of AMD FX microprocessors
Poorly threaded web based tests like the SunSpider and Chalkboard benchmarks showed much larger gains than well threaded tests like our wPrime and Truecrypt benchmarks. Username or Email Address Password. Bulldoer or Email Address.
It targets desktop, mobile and server markets. Sign up now Username Password Remember Me.
Steamroller - Family 15h 3rd-gen. Nexiuz is a game that, even with Vsync disabled has a frame cap at 63 frames per second. These chips are obviously much larger than Intel's 22nm Ivy Bridge parts, but Intel has a full node advantage there which enables that. This later generation of Bulldozer core was codenamed Piledriver.
assembly - what instruction sets in piledriver but not bulldozer - Stack Overflow
Piledriver is a bit more power efficient than Bulldozerwhich enables AMD to drive Vishera's frequency up while remaining in the same thermal envelope as Zambezi.
Retrieved 22 March Sign up using Email and Password. NET benchmark, Piledriver is once again ahead by eight percent. This page was last edited on 21 Decemberat Moving to gaming benchmarks we tested out two contenders in three games today; Crysis 2, Counter-Strike: Post Your Answer Discard By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.
Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
Does Piledriver deliver where Bulldozer fell short? All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from August Plus, they're about x easier to understand when programming. The changes over Bulldozer are incremental.
AMD's FX analyzed: Does Piledriver deliver where Bulldozer fell short? - ExtremeTech
One thing we can conclude off the bat — Piledrivsr delivers some of the clock speed Bulldozer promised. Retrieved 6 January Retrieved 11 March Looking at Handbrake, Piledriver outperforms Bulldozer again by about six percent.
Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Retrieved 23 March The table above says it all.
Oh, by the way, tell me what you see on page 2 of the following AMD document: The big take away from our testing here is that the Piledriver core is without question faster than the Bulldozer core. After reviewing the operations bu,ldozer code needs to perform, I find a great number of recent bit manipulation instructions will be extremely helpful.
Following Bulldozer's mediocre reception, AMD insisted that the new architecture was still young and would serve as a "solid building block" for the FX series. As a fabless semiconductor manufacturer, AMD is now at GF's mercy when it comes to moving process technology forward.
Clock speeds and TDPs are also up compared to Trinity. There were two bit FMACs shared per module, allowing for two bit instructions per core or one bit instruction per dual-core module.
Comments
Post a Comment